I took this picture in Oia long ago.

It tells me a lot about urban form.

The balcony probably wanted to be deeper, but the alley wanted to be wider and turn left.
​
Some negotiation seems to have occurred between those two entities.
The result is delightful because the balcony nourishes the alley and the alley nourishes the balcony.
​
This seems to be a definition of beauty: beauty happens when entities draw their raison d'être and wholeness from the extent to which they are complementary parts of an interlocking whole.

I took this picture in the small station de ski of Meribel, in the French Alps some ten years ago. The richness and simplicity of the ornament in the railing  strikes me to this day - just a void shape.

So much is achieved in such a simple way, just sawn wood. And infinite care for every inch of one's surroundings.

This seems to be the only thing that matters: infinite care for every inch .

​

I do not know the location of this court painted by Chilean artist Guillermo Munoz Vera, but I feel like arriving at a well prepared banquet. Everything was taken care of, to the last detail. 

In any place in the world, each component of the surroundings transmits a message, conveys an essence, emits a  set of feelings.
​
Moving around any place is listening to the myriad of messages being transmitted. These messages can be intelligent, pleasant, delightful if made with devotion, tenderness, respect. 
​
​This place seems to have been carefully built: hand-painted azulejos, flowerpots, flowers, trees, fallen leaves, still water, trellises, plaster, trimmed shrubs, filtered sunlight, reflection on water, objets trouvés..

The 1748 Nolli plan of Rome  is a never-ending source of inspiration. It shows the structure of accessible public space in Rome at that time.

The built mass (gray, black) and the void (white) are complementary parts of a whole, the external walls of the buildings being the internal walls of the outdoor spaces. 

There is nothing but the void and the mass, yet the whole is neither one.

I took this picture in Venice.

The alley is probably a meter-and-a-half wide.
At this level of closeness, one can sense the recently-baked pain au chocolat  smells permeating the calle, every item in the patisserie's display can be clearly seen. It is easy to recognize subtle details in passers-by's garments and even discern facial expressions.

Small dimensions and the resulting intimacy seem to have been erased from modern urban planning.

Concerning small dimensions that modern urban planning decided to abolish, the facade of this store at Roquebrune-Cap-Martin in Provence demonstrates how much can happen in the half-a-meter space between the vertical wall and the horizontal street. 

This relatively small territory is appropriated and personalized through color, plants, signs, merchandise, a small carpet.
​Is the in-between half-a-meter space private or public?  Both? Neither? A mediator?
​
The ambiguous borders between private and public seem to have been delightfully blurred. 

​

After we mentioned the meaning of a meter-and-a-half in urban planning, and the impact of half-a-meter in urban environments, this facade makes clear the impact that even smaller dimensions can make on the urban space.
​
I think I took this picture in Aix-les-Bains or in Paris, 

The rilievo doesn't stick more than five to ten centimetres out of the wall, and yet it is capable of telling a meaningful story and link to the otherwise flat wall to tradition and history. Outlawed in modern architecture, ornament and splendor are in fact basic human needs.
​

Vernacular architectural languages and dialects  were created by millions of people over thousands of years. 
​
Just like the verbal languages, architectural languages combine everyday insights of thousands and millions of individuals and the wisdom built up in a few architectural patterns that evolved through time.
Can we a posteriori rationalize the patterns we find?
The colors, vertical openings, juxtaposition of buildings, textures, immediacy to water, are they the reason for the richness of experience? 
Or the reason is in a sort of architectural Tao that can not be named, explained or expressed in words? Apparently it has to be lived unintentionally.

Framing the surroundings makes us believe that we master the vast, infinite space around us.
​
In this project a piece of nature is cut out of a boundless, intimidating world and made into part of our interior, protected space.

Breaking the environs into pieces makes it easier to grasp and contemplate, no need to make sense of it.

Taming the surroundings produces a feeling of control.
This garden in the Villa Torrigiani in Lucca is composed of framed water, trimmed plants, frozen animals and petrified humans. The lions are cast in stone - just to be on the safe side - and mastered to a point that they loyally pour water in the pool.
The humans are as well  carved in stone, under control. We can move freely, supreme.

​The Villa Medici Fiesole in Tuscany seems to have it all: hills and a flat surface.

Rather than fighting topography, befriending the environment's natural features seems to have produced here a captivating result, a "top-of-the-world" feeling  combined with flat gardens where one can plant - or just stroll.

This aerial view of the Mount of Olives Cemetery in Jerusalem shows the Necropolis juxtaposed to the 'Biopolis'.
Here architecture  manipulates space by encircling the dead,  delimitating grief, curbing sorrow and fear in physical boundaries, as if this would also limit death itself.
We then live our lives pretending that death is a  phenomenon restricted inside the cemetery walls.
​I don't see it, therefore it does not exist.

We are used to turning a faucet and get running water, but procuring water in the Chand Baori stepped well in Rajastan  must have been a totally different experience, weaving  layers of history and various facets of life - ceremonial, social, physical, spiritual.
The modern era cancelled the metaphysical layers, favoring  physical wellbeing and 'despiritualizing' life.
​Can it last long?

This building in Taborstrasse,  Vienna,  illustrates the forgotten 'principle number one' of the design of classical cities and buildings:  buildings and cities were created in the image of Man. They had eyes, heads, noses, feet, hair, nails, skin, eyelids, mouths, shoulders, lips, arms and legs.
​Accordingly, the education of an architect included drawing the human figure and learning its anatomy. 

 I saw a sign in a street in Vienna really translates as  "this street is art". It then epitomizes what a street can be: a gallery of objects, people, events. 
I took this picture of a now defunct workshop of picture frames in Jerusalem.
If every window of the street says it's word, the street is a phrase and the city becomes a story told by many actors.

​This building in Buenos Aires exemplifies one of the basic principles of 'classic' architecture: each floor is treated differently so that in each of the seven floors- including the mansard, various stratagems are used in order to avoid repetition on the vertical axis: changing balconies, different balustrades, handrails, cornices, moldings, arches, blinders, geometry, proportions and textures.

The urban tracé of Copacabana, my home neighborhood, displays a kind of clear thinking we seem to have consigned to oblivion: it is made of roads parallel to the sea and perpendicular to the sea.
The result is an invisible presence and a full connection to the site. Squeezed between the sea and the hills, perpendicular roads head either to the sea or to the hills. 
Another interesting detail is that the urban plan is pre-modern, but it was filled with mostly modern architecture, an experiment to be examined, since while modern architecture has its advantages and disadvantages, modern urban design is a perfect disaster.

​Maybe this model could be a way to accommodate the positive side of modern architecture? 
​

This old gate in the town of  Taormina, Sicilia, frames a gray dome at a distance and a mountain on the background.
​
​The street experience is thus composed of the near surroundings  but extends to other areas, all scales coexisting simultaneously.

The gate, the dome and the street facades seem to have been built at different periods,  all layers of time coexisting simultaneously.